Unattractiveness in volume electric cars, a hidden agenda?

Before the 2007-2009 recession it seemed like most governments (in the OECD countries) were reluctant to go down the electric vehicle route. Car companies were also reluctant citing high costs of manufacturing, the maximum distance possible for an electric vehicle to cover before requiring recharge, and perceived public rejection as serious hurdles to overcome.

However, what makes me wonder about some of these car companies is that they still market their gas guzzling 2-seater sports cars with bimbos in bikinis standing next to them. The issue of fuel consumption is never raised. They have done such a fantastic marketing job that “sexy” is now synonymous with an expensive sports car. Some of these cars are worse than SUVs when it comes to fuel consumption. If only SUVs were advertised with bimbos in bikinis! I don’t know about you but where I live, most people with SUVs are middle class people running businesses and they need something useful for work. In other cases it is just simple families that are do-it-yourselfers to cut costs, and an SUV is such a convenient workhorse for them.

Now going back to the electric cars and even the petrol-electric hybrids, most of what I have seen so far for the general public is so unattractive that even grandma wouldn’t want to drive one. None of those cars are advertised with bimbos in bikinis either. You are left wondering whether it’s a deliberate move from cars companies to ensure that the public will not like electric cars. They are also very expensive, which is off-putting.
I also found out recently from The Economist magazine that a study at Concordia University in Montreal showed that testosterone levels shot up when men got behind the wheel of a sexy sports car, and fell, making them lose their joie de vivre, when they were made to drive a clunky family saloon car. I bet the results would have not changed if the latter car was one of those electric or petrol-electric hybrid vehicles we have on the market today.

The recession must have forced most governments to look at how to use stimulus money to prop up ailing economies and going green seems to have been embraced by many as a way out. Subsidies for purchasing electric cars have got many companies (that have been sitting on the fence), now looking at the possibilities of going electric for some of their vehicles. Has anyone noticed the number of electric vehicles at the Paris Motor Show 2010?


Fast Tube by Casper

Those subsidies will not last for long and I wonder if they dry up whether it will be business-as-usual again for these car companies, i.e. back to petrol cars.

I am not convinced yet that car companies are sold out to the “electric-vehicle” idea. CHANGE has not happened until you start to see “sexy” and practical designs, with bimbos in bikinis standing next to such vehicles. Get me an EV that will even excite the people of Gisburn, restore their joie de vivre, and I will know we are certainly on the road to reducing carbon emissions and curbing climate change. If you do not know about Gisburn and Renault cars you ought to check this out:


Fast Tube by Casper

 Facebook  StumbleUpon  Technorati  Deli.cio.us  Slashdot  Twitter  Google 

Tags: , , ,

No comments yet.

*

Inaction of governments and private sector: climate change mitigation

A couple of months ago I wrote a post about the boom-stalemate-decay phenomenon and had no idea why it is a fact of life. I went as far as suggesting how to deal with it, even though I could not put my finger on what caused it.

I just might be getting closer as to the reasons why, but still with no solution in sight. My theory is this, when a business, government department etc is started by a keen, vibrant and innovative leadership, success is guaranteed. If the demand for service offered or products sold exceeds supply, the logical step is to expand and meet the demand. Almost everyone is keen to be part of the expansion. You only have to look at Google and the number of wannabes that are constantly trying to get a job with Google.

What tends to happen during expansion is an oversight of recruiting inexperienced personnel, friends and/or family into key positions, which I believe is the start of the problem. “A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump”. These incompetent people get hooked to the money and/or fame and will start recruiting their own kind in order to cover their inadequacies i.e. there is a shift in focus where the workplace gets dominated by backstabbing and endless meetings. The skilled workers get frustrated and many of them leave. This affects productivity and then the restructuring starts, one after the other, with massive injection of capital in the hope of returning to the “good old days”.

And of course once decay sets in, it is unstoppable … sadly it is like someone who is terminally ill. It seems to avoid such, one has to start early and ruthlessly weed out any signs of decay. Failure to do so would result in a mess, which is almost impossible to untangle. The best way sometimes is to trash the whole lot and start anew. The chilling fact is that many government departments and private businesses are caught up in the stalemate-decay phase and no wonder the whole world seems to be moving at a glacial pace in responding to climate change mitigation. It seems nothing short of a catastrophe will push us into action. I wish it would be different.


Fast Tube by Casper

Anyway, what do you all think about this out there?

 Facebook  StumbleUpon  Technorati  Deli.cio.us  Slashdot  Twitter  Google 

Tags: , , ,

No comments yet.

*