Archive for June, 2009

Is it really about Emissions Trading or Carbon Tax?

When I started looking into the details of paying for emissions I ended up somewhat biased against Emissions Trading. The financial crisis did not help either, as I somehow tried to justify to myself that it was itself overwhelming evidence of what would happened to an Emissions Trading Scheme. Because of its similarity to an options market, I conjured up a situation where carbon traders would invent derivatives (no different from the credit default swaps), which will ultimately bring the whole system to its knees, just like what we observed with the current financial crisis. I flirted with the idea of a carbon tax for a while, because it was obviously easy to understand. However, what I hadn’t factored in my thought process was that tax systems are man-made and, therefore not perfect, needing re-jigging from time to time to suit the situation at hand. There isn’t a single country in the world that has got its tax system in perfect order, as governments, year after year, continue to tinker their tax systems.


Fast Tube by Casper

As I started to move away from trying to find or justify what I thought would be the best delivery mechanism of achieving low emissions, and rather looking more into the impacts of climate change and a desire to mitigate it, I found out something about myself. I realized that no matter which system or systems the world will adopt, the hard issue I was not willing to face was, CHANGE … i.e. moving away from “business-as-usual” and start doing things different. Like leaving the car at home and commuting on public transport, or cycle, or walk. This is such a hard thing to do and somehow I entertained the idea that with clean energy I could still maintain my affluent ways or similar levels of energy spending. It is not hard to see that if all or most of us maintain our current affluent levels, even with new clean energy, at some point, demand will outstrip diminishing supply.
So, I had been thinking all along that the whole emissions reductions notion is about making the right choice between Emissions Trading and Carbon Tax, and ultimately arresting climate change. In actual fact it is all about which system will cause less pain (for me) and will mean less change of my old habits. Because of this discovery (of myself), I am starting to think that it really doesn’t matter whether its Emissions Trading or Carbon Tax, as long as it is sufficient to cause us to change our ways of affluent living and become more conservative in energy consumption (or energy efficient). We have to bite the bullet, at some point, and do what’s right for the future generation. Arresting Climate Change will have to start with a mind change.

 Facebook  StumbleUpon  Technorati  Deli.cio.us  Slashdot  Twitter  Google 

Tags: , ,

A crisis is a terrible thing to waste!

I search the Internet quite regularly for new innovations in car manufacturing that will genuinely turn us away from the conventional family or work vehicle. I recall in 2007 that there were lots of articles regarding electric and hybrid-electric vehicles that were going to hit the market in 2010. I therefore, entertained the thought of owning one of those vehicles when they became available. Come 2009, and it seems the dates are being shifted further to 2011/2012, which is starting to get me disillusioned.

Since most if not all car manufacturers are struggling under the current financial crisis, one would want to think that it would be sensible for the car manufacturers to race putting practical and useful electric or hybrid-electric vehicles on the market. Since the public has been shell-shocked into the “Peak Oil” crisis, I think they are now ready to commit to electric or hybrid-electric vehicles. This, in my opinion, would lure buyers back into the market that would restarting the broken global economy.

However, I might be missing something here, because we are not seeing these cars on the market at all. What are car manufacturers waiting for? Don’t tell me they do not have the capital to switch to these new technologies or investing into the new support infrastructure for these types of vehicles, because I am still reading in car magazines about new (unnecessary) horrendously expensive, high performance behemoths coming on the market. This is obscene to say the least and I wish that more people would NOT put their hard earned money on such wasteful vehicles, which would send a message to all car manufacturers.

Even the super deals on conventional cars to “kick start the economy” is certainly not a clever idea to me as it is a way of ensuring a destiny of global warming, for the future generations. Have a look at the Tesla Model S, which is an efficient electric car (of a sedan design), which I understand would save a typical driver about US$600 per year compared to a BMW M3.


Fast Tube by Casper

Over seven years, that would save the owner about US$4200. The battery replacement after seven years costs US$12,000, but factor in Shai Agassi’s innovation, where the battery is rented by the car owner, and you start talking decent savings here.


Fast Tube by Casper

I am hoping that there will be a car manufacturer that will see the light and take advantage “yesterday” of this global financial crisis by providing practical and useful means of transport that runs on clean energy. If one company takes the precedent, I have no doubt in my mind that that the rest would follow. It’s a pity to see the private sector waiting for governments to lead them along on this matter, rather than taking the initiative. A crisis is a terrible thing to waste! … Take heed, car manufacturers, take heed!

 Facebook  StumbleUpon  Technorati  Deli.cio.us  Slashdot  Twitter  Google 

Tags: