Climate Change Mitigation Forum

Chameleon Island Blog on Climate Change Mitigation covering home appliances, transport, and emissions trading

Posts Tagged Climate change

The big detour: Climategate affair

Dec 7

Posted by chikhoog in Attitudes | No Comments

By now most of you have heard about the hundreds of e-mails sent by climate scientists that were illegally hacked from the Climate Research Unit at East Anglia University, England. As it pans out there were particular e-mails that questioned or led to questions regarding global warming. The debate is raging around the world on whether or not those e-mails were taken out of context or possibly edited, as well. This is what has come to be known as “Climategate” affair … and one is left wondering about its timing a few weeks before the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen.


Fast Tube by Casper

There is obvious doubt being cast on these climate change scientists on whether they analysed these data to maybe fit their theories on global warming. The opposition seems to be predominantly ideological and yet is attacking the science. While I am a firm believer on debating issues to decipher the truth, it would be nice to keep ideologists from both sides of the argument in one camp, and scientists, also from both sides of the argument in their own. It would also be fair to subject climate change skeptics to the same level of transparency that these climate scientists are being subjected to.

However, I should point out that it is ludicrous to ever think that an establishment as old as science would not have the same internal politics (some of which may have been visible in the e-mails) that leads to back-stabbing, cliques, nepotism and dishonesty, rife in some sections of business, non-government and government organizations. I guess this has to be taken into consideration in the Climategate affair and perhaps question whether the science establishment has sufficient checks and balances that rise above internal politics and guarantee delivery of “good science” to the general public.

But somehow to use the Climategate to sow seeds of doubt on restructuring programs and commitment to lower emissions is somewhat obstructive. Hopefully the dust will settle early and we can all go back to the issue that really matters, i.e. good stewardship of mother earth, climate change or not. I would want to think that both sides of the climate change debate will agree that we, as the public, are living beyond our means … it is unsustainable and we ought to find a way forward. So the Climategate affair has now become another big detour on the long road to low emissions.

 Facebook  StumbleUpon  Technorati  Deli.cio.us  Slashdot  Twitter  Google 

Tags: , ,

Boom, stalemate and decay cycle

Jul 16

Posted by chikhoog in Attitudes | 3 Comments

The propensity to become irrelevant and/or self-destruct, once it sets in, is almost impossible to stop. There is no amount of innovation, capital injection, meetings, or restructuring it seems, that will reverse this process of irrelevance or self-destruction. The good thing though, is that once irrelevance/self-destruction has well and truly started, it paves the way for innovation and a quick acceptance and uptake of new and bold ideas. This implies that only through a crisis created by becoming irrelevant or self-destructing, do we dare to adopt change. You could say that that the propensity to become irrelevant or self-destructive is a necessary and sufficient “evil” that enables us to embrace change or take up innovation.

It seems most systems follow this cycle of boom (relevance), stalemate (capital injection, restructuring etc) and decay (irrelevance/death). Think of Kodak and what happened to its business because of the adoption of digital technology. Look at GM Motors with all the massive capital injection from the US government, which did not leave the company unscathed. Think of slavery, that the British government stopped and within a year of stopping it, paved the way for the Industrial Revolution. You almost have to wonder whether Microsoft’ s time is up (as in loosing relevance) as the competition from Google becomes fiercer with every new product Google puts on the market. What about the infrastructural change we face today to Clean Energy that will see a lot of businesses, educational systems, and political ideologies become irrelevant.

I guess the million-dollar question is that, is there any way a business or government can stay relevant forever? I do not know, although one thing is evident, our history is littered with examples that seem to suggest that we cannot. Let’s us say we cannot … why then can’t we put management systems and protocols in place that will enable us to transition better from becoming irrelevant to becoming relevant. That is, rather than fighting to keep more of the same that is showing signs of decay, allow the boom-stalemate-decay phenomena to follow its natural course and concentrate resources on building or preparing for the “new”. This would save us from painful restructuring and capital injection, which is only indicative of our yearning of the past that was once relevant. As many of us know, we perceive change as something that will cost us our jobs and livelihood and sometimes it is like that, but more importantly it holds the key to our continued survival and allows us to embrace a future that we are not frightened of.

Now think of Climate Change mitigation in this context … We are reaching a critical situation and its not surprising that many businesses and/or governments are injecting massive capital for more of the same that is starting to show decay. Wake up world, it’s that time again to transition into the “new”!

 Facebook  StumbleUpon  Technorati  Deli.cio.us  Slashdot  Twitter  Google 

Tags: , ,